Journal
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 341-350Publisher
AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JTECH1858.1
Keywords
-
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The effects of flow distortion created by the ship's hull and superstructure bias wind speed measurements made from anemometers located oil ships. Flow distortion must be taken into account if accurate air-sea flux measurements are to be achieved. Little work has been undertaken to examine the wind speed bias due to flow distortion in wind speed reports from voluntary observing ships (VOS). In this first part of a two-part paper the accuracy of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code VECTIS in simulating the airflow over VOS is investigated. Simulations of the airflow over a representation of the bridge of a VOS are compared to in situ wind speed measurements made from six anemometers located above the bridge of the RRS Charles Darwin The ship's structure was ideal for reproducing the flow over VOS when the wind is blowing onto either beam. The comparisons showed VECTIS was accurate to within 4% in predicting the wind speed over ships, except in extreme cases such as wake regions or the legion close to the bridge top where the flow may be stagnant or reverse direction. The study showed that there was little change in the numerically predicted flow pattern above the bridge with change in Reynolds number between 2 X 10(5) and 1 X 10(7). The findings showed that the CFD code VECTIS call reliably be used to determine the mean flow above typical VOS.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available