4.4 Article

Salivary biomarkers of existing periodontal disease - A cross-sectional study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages 322-329

Publisher

AMER DENTAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0181

Keywords

periodontal disease; saliva; biomarkers; interleukin-1 beta; matrix metalloproteinase

Funding

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [UO1 DE15017] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The authors conducted a study to determine if salivary biomarkers specific for three aspects of periodontitis-inflammation, collagen degradation and bone turnover-correlate with clinical features of periodontal disease. Methods. The relationship between periodontal disease and the levels of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8, and osteoprotegerin (OPG) in whole saliva of 57 adults (28 case subjects with moderate-to-severe periodontal disease and 29 healthy control subjects) was examined in a case-control trial. Results. Mean levels of IL-1 beta and MMP-8 in saliva were significantly higher in case subjects than in controls. Both analytes correlated with periodontal indexes, whereas, after adjustment for confounders, OPG did not. Elevated salivary levels of MMP-8 or IL-1 beta (more than two standard deviations above the mean of the controls) significantly increased the risk of periodontal disease (odds ratios in the 11.3-15.4 range). Combined elevated salivary levels of MMP-8 and II-1 beta increased the risk of experiencing periodontal disease 45-fold, and elevations in all three biomarkers correlated with individual clinical parameters indicative of periodontal disease. Conclusion. Salivary levels of MMP-8 and IL-1 beta appear to serve as biomarkers of periodontitis. Clinical Implications. Qualitative changes in the composition of salivary biomarkers could have significance in the diagnosis and treatment of periodontal disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available