4.7 Article

Golimumab in combination with methotrexate in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of the GO-FORTH study

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages 817-824

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2011.200317

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Centocor Research & Development Inc
  2. Janssen Pharmaceuticals KK
  3. Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharmaceutical Corporation
  4. Abbott
  5. Bristol Myers Squibb
  6. Chugai Pharmaceutical
  7. Eizai Pharmaceutical
  8. Janssen Pharmaceutical
  9. Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharmaceutical
  10. Otsuka Pharmaceutical
  11. Roche
  12. Takeda Pharmaceutical
  13. Wyeth
  14. Astellas Pharmaceutical
  15. Immunofuture Inc
  16. Santen Pharmaceutical
  17. Astra Zeneca
  18. Banyu Pharmaceutical
  19. Daiichi Sankyo Pharmaceutical
  20. GlaxoSmith Kline
  21. Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim
  22. Teijin Pharmaceutical
  23. Pfizer
  24. Novartis
  25. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22390198, 23249054] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of golimumab + methotrexate (MTX) in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods 269 Japanese patients with active RA despite treatment with MTX were randomised (1:1:1) to placebo + MTX (Group 1), golimumab 50 mg + MTX (Group 2) or golimumab 100 mg + MTX (Group 3). Subcutaneous golimumab/placebo was injected every 4 weeks; stable doses of oral MTX (6-8 mg/week) were continued. Patients were allowed to enter early escape (Group 1 added golimumab 50 mg, Group 2 increased golimumab to 100 mg, Group 3 continued golimumab 100 mg) based on swollen/tender joint counts at week 14. The primary study endpoint was achievement of at least 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response criteria at week 14. To control for multiplicity of testing, treatment group comparisons were first made between combined Groups 2 and 3 versus Group 1, followed by comparisons of Group 2 and Group 3 versus Group 1. Results The proportion of patients with an ACR20 response at week 14 was significantly higher in combined Groups 2 and 3 (73.4%, 127/173) and in each of Group 2 (72.1%, 62/86) and Group 3 (74.7%, 65/87) compared with Group 1 (27.3%, 24/88; p<0.0001 for all comparisons). Golimumab + MTX also elicited a significantly better response than placebo + MTX in other efficacy parameters, including disease activity score (DAS28) response/remission and radiographic assessments. During the 16-week fixed treatment regimen study period, 72.7%, 75.6% and 78.2% of patients had adverse events and 1.1%, 1.2% and 2.3% had serious adverse events in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion In Japanese patients with active RA despite MTX therapy, golimumab + MTX was significantly more effective than MTX monotherapy in reducing RA signs/symptoms and limiting radiographic progression with no unexpected safety concerns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available