4.7 Review

Optimising treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a review of potential biological markers of response

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 70, Issue 12, Pages 2063-2070

Publisher

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2010.148015

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
  2. Cancer Research UK
  3. Versus Arthritis [18475] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10299] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Following a greater understanding of the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the treatment of this chronic disease has improved with the availability of biological agents targeting key molecules. Despite this, initial treatment produces an inadequate response in many patients and guidance on the optimal treatment for these patients is needed. Research in specific patient populations aims to define predictive biomarkers of response to identify those patients most likely to benefit from treatment with specific agents. Although there have been conflicting results from studies of various genetic markers, single nucleotide polymorphisms in the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) -308 promoter region may play a role in response to specific TNF inhibitors. Microarray analysis of mRNA expression levels has identified unique sets of genes with differentially regulated expression in responders compared with non-responders to the TNF inhibitor infliximab. Of the various protein biomarkers studied, rheumatoid factor and/or anticitrullinated protein autoantibodies may have a future role in predicting response or guiding the order in which to use biological agents. Further research is needed with larger, well-designed studies to clarify the current understanding on the role of biomarkers in predicting treatment response in RA to help guide clinical decision-making. Individualised treatment has the potential to improve the therapeutic outcomes for patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available