4.5 Article

Enhanced clinical utility of the NucliSens EasyQ RSV A+B assay for rapid detection of respiratory syncytial virus in clinical samples

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/S10096-006-0112-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to compare traditional methods for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus with a newly developed commercial assay based on real-time nucleic acid sequence based amplification. Respiratory syncytial virus is a major cause of severe respiratory infection in infants and in certain groups of older children and adults. Treatment options are limited, but a rapid diagnosis improves patient management and infection control. The rapid diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus currently relies on antigen detection assays. These tests are limited to use in certain good-quality types of samples, which are rarely obtained from adult patients. Molecular-based assays for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus are shown to be highly sensitive, specific, and more rapid than cell culture techniques. This retrospective study compared traditional laboratory techniques for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus in 508 respiratory samples collected during the winter months of 2003-2004 against the recently developed, commercially available NucliSens EasyQ Respiratory Syncytial Virus A+B assay (bioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), which is based on real-time nucleic acid sequence based amplification using molecular beacons and an internal control. Using traditional techniques, the prevalence of respiratory syncytial virus in the samples tested was found to be 21%. Using the real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assay, an additional 41 samples from patients with a clinically diagnosed respiratory illness were found to be positive for respiratory syncytial virus. The NucliSens EasyQ assay was shown to be sensitive and specific for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus A+B in different types of respiratory samples. Moreover, the time required to complete the assay was < 4 h, so results could be obtained on the same day as sample receipt in the laboratory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available