4.6 Article

Spermatogenesis in the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo):: Quantitative approach in immature and adult males subjected to various photoperiods

Journal

THERIOGENOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 845-859

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.01.012

Keywords

photostimulation; turkey; poultry; spermatogenesis; semen production

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objectives of this study were to identify and quantitate the germ cell Populations of the testes in sexually mature male turkeys (Trial 1), determine the duration of meiosis based on BrdU labeling and stereological analyses (Trial 2), and examine the impact of various photoperiods on germinal and somatic Cell Populations in immature and adult males (Trial 3). In Trial 1, both testes within a male had similar stereological components (P > 0.05) for all parameters analyzed. In Trial 2, the duration of Type-1 spermatocytes and round spermatids in turkeys lasted 4.5 +/- 0.5 and 2.0 +/- 0.5 days, respectively. In Trial 3, the short photoperiod (7L: 17D) delayed testicular growth (in the stereological parameters analyzed). In contrast, the effect of it moderately short photoperiod (10.5L: 13.5D) was comparable to the effect of a long (14L: 10D) or increasing photoperiod (7L: 17D to 14L: 10D) on the stereological parameters examined. With the exception of the short photoperiod, all other photoperiods used in this study induced comparable early testicular maturation, with maximum testis weight at 29-35 weeks of age. As the males got older, there was a progressive, linear decline in testis weight through 60 weeks, at which time there were no significant differences among photoperiods. In conclusion, the duration of meiosis in the turkey was similar to that observed in the fowl and guinea-fowl. The existence of a threshold of photosensitivity to gonad stimulation in male turkeys is Suggested to be between 7.0 and 10.5 h of light. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available