4.7 Article

Prediction of MRI erosive progression: a comparison of modern imaging modalities in early rheumatoid arthritis patients

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 70, Issue 1, Pages 176-179

Publisher

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.126953

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
  2. Research Council of Norway
  3. Norwegian Rheumatism Association
  4. Norwegian Women Public Health Association
  5. Grethe Harbitz Legacy
  6. Marie and Else Mustad's Legacy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To examine the associations between modern imaging modalities and joint damage measured as 1-year MRI erosive progression, in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Methods 84 RA patients with disease duration of less than 1 year were included in this inception cohort. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months by core measures of disease activity, MRI and ultrasound grey-scale (USGS) of inflammation, conventional radiography and digital x-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) bone mineral density (BMD) of cortical hand bone. Results 53 of the 79 patients (67%) who completed the follow-up had MRI erosive progression (dependent variable). USGS and MRI bone marrow oedema (BME) were in multivariate analyses independent predictors of 1-year MRI erosive progression. There was a trend towards higher MRI synovitis score and 3-month DXR BMD loss in patients developing MRI erosions. On an individual level, USGS inflammation, MRI synovitis and MRI BME also somewhat better predicted outcome than rheumatoid factor, anticitrullinated protein antibodies and disease activity score 28. Conclusions USGS inflammation and MRI BME were independent predictors of MRI erosive progression in early RA patients on a group level. The exact prognosis of the individual patients could not be determined by imaging alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available