4.7 Review

EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages 964-975

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.126532

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Abbott
  2. Amgen
  3. BMS
  4. Centocor
  5. Pfizer
  6. Roche
  7. Schering-Plough
  8. UCB
  9. Sanofi-Aventis
  10. Wyeth
  11. Novartis
  12. Nordic Pharma
  13. Biotest
  14. Axis-Shield
  15. Merck
  16. Essex
  17. MSD
  18. Wyeth/Pfizer
  19. Abbott Schering Plough/MSD
  20. Genentech
  21. Essex/Schering-Plough
  22. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0507-10104, NF-SI-0508-10299] Funding Source: researchfish
  23. Versus Arthritis [18475] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may differ among rheumatologists and currently, clear and consensual international recommendations on RA treatment are not available. In this paper recommendations for the treatment of RA with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and glucocorticoids (GCs) that also account for strategic algorithms and deal with economic aspects, are described. The recommendations are based on evidence from five systematic literature reviews (SLRs) performed for synthetic DMARDs, biological DMARDs, GCs, treatment strategies and economic issues. The SLR-derived evidence was discussed and summarised as an expert opinion in the course of a Delphi-like process. Levels of evidence, strength of recommendations and levels of agreement were derived. Fifteen recommendations were developed covering an area from general aspects such as remission/low disease activity as treatment aim via the preference for methotrexate monotherapy with or without GCs vis-a-vis combination of synthetic DMARDs to the use of biological agents mainly in patients for whom synthetic DMARDs and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors had failed. Cost effectiveness of the treatments was additionally examined. These recommendations are intended to inform rheumatologists, patients and other stakeholders about a European consensus on the management of RA with DMARDs and GCs as well as strategies to reach optimal outcomes of RA, based on evidence and expert opinion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available