4.7 Article

Mortality risk stratification in chronic kidney disease: One size for all ages?

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 846-853

Publisher

AMERICAN SOCIETY NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2005090986

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG000912] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative staging criteria for chronic kidney disease (CKD) are intended to apply to all age groups. However, it is unclear whether different levels of estimated GFR (eGFR) have the same prognostic significance in older and younger patients. The study cohort was composed of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) patients who were aged 18 to 100 yr and had at least one outpatient serum creatinine measurement between October 1, 2001, and September 30, 2002 (n = 2583,911). Patients with ESRD were excluded. GFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation using each patient's first outpatient creatinine measurement during the study period. The association of eGFR with survival was measured by age group. Twenty percent of cohort patients had an eGFR < 60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), ranging from 3% among 18- to 44-yr-olds to as high as 49% among 85- to 100-yr-olds. Fifty-two percent (n = 266,421) of cohort patients with an eGFR < 60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) had very moderate reductions in eGFR into the 50 to 59-ml/min per 1.73 m(2) range. The association of eGFR with mortality was weaker in the elderly than in younger age groups: Whereas severe reductions in eGFR were associated with an increased risk for death in all age groups, very moderate reductions in eGFR (50 to 59 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)) were associated with an increased adjusted risk for death only among patients who were younger than 65 yr. Age-related attenuation of the association of eGFR with mortality was also present among women and black patients. In the clinical setting, mortality risk stratification in elderly patients should not be based on the same eGFR cut points as for younger age groups and would benefit from finer categorization of the 30- to 59-ml/min per 1.73 In 2 eGFR group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available