4.5 Article

Characterization and long-term maintenance of rat taste cells in culture

Journal

CHEMICAL SENSES
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 279-290

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjj030

Keywords

culture; gustducin; imaging; proliferation; taste receptor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Taste cells have a limited life span and are replaced from a basal cell population, although the specific factors involved in this process are not well known. Short- and long-term cultures of other sensory cells have facilitated efforts to understand the signals involved in proliferation, differentiation, and senescence, yet few studies have reported successful primary culture protocols for taste cells. Furthermore, no studies have demonstrated both proliferation and differentiation in vitro. In this study, we have developed an in vitro culture system to maintain and utilize rat primary taste cells for more than 2 months without losing key molecular and biochemical features. Gustducin, phospholipase C-beta(2) (PLC-beta(2)), T1R3, and T2R5 mRNA were detected in the cultured cells by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Western blot analysis demonstrated gustducin and PLC-beta(2) expression in the same samples, which was confirmed by immunocytochemistry. Labeling with bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) demonstrated proliferation, and a subset of BrdU-labeled cells were also immunoreactive for either gustducin or PLC-beta(2), indicating differentiation of newly generated cells in vitro. Cultured cells also exhibited increases in intracellular calcium in response to several taste stimuli. These results indicate that taste cells from adult rats can be generated and maintained under the described conditions for at least 2 months. This system will enable further studies of the processes involved in proliferation, differentiation, and function of mammalian taste receptor cells in an in vitro preparation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available