4.6 Article

Influence of body mass index on the response to asthma controller agents

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 495-503

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.06.00077205

Keywords

asthma; beclomethasone; body mass index; inhaled corticosteroid; leukotriene antagonist; montelukast

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The incidence of asthma has been positively associated with obesity. Asthma comprises diverse phenotypes reflecting heterogeneity in a number of characteristics' including response to therapy. The present authors examined whether body mass index (BMI) influenced the response to placebo, as well as to two asthma controller medications. A post hoc analysis was performed, pooling data from four double-blind, placebo-controlled studies randomising 3,073 moderate asthmatic adults to montelukast (n = 1,439), beclomethasone (n = 894) or placebo (n = 740). The primary end point was asthma control days; other end points were forced expiratory volume in one second, beta-agonist use and nocturnal awakening. Analyses were conducted using BMI classification into normal (< 25.0 kg center dot m(-2); 52% of patients), overweight (25-29.9 kg center dot m(-2) 32%) and obese (>=-30.0 kg center dot m(-2); 16%) categories, as well as BMI as a continuous variable. The treatment groups were balanced for BMI, demographic characteristics and parameters of asthma control. The placebo response for all end points was generally lower with increasing BMI. Similarly, the response to the inhaled corticosteroid decreased, whereas the response to the leukotriene antagonist remained stable. In conclusion, post hoc data from the present study suggested that body mass index may influence the natural history of asthma control (as reflected by response to placebo) and may differentially influence response to the two active agents, warranting explicit testing in future prospective studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available