4.7 Article

The interleukin 23 receptor gene does not confer risk to systemic sclerosis and is not associated with systemic sclerosis disease phenotype

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 253-256

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2008.096719

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Junta de Andalucia [CTS-180]
  2. Dutch association of Research (NWO, VENI and VIDI laureate)
  3. [SAF2006-00398]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Multiple studies indicate the role of the interleukin (IL)-17/IL-23 axis in autoimmune diseases, including systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aim of the current study was to investigate the possible implication of the IL23R gene in SSc susceptibility and/or clinical phenotype. Methods: An initial case-control study in 143 Dutch patients with SSc and geographically matched healthy individuals (n = 246) was carried out and followed by a replication study in a cohort of 365 Spanish patients with SSc and 515 healthy individuals. Seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) spanning the IL23R gene were selected and genotyped using a Taqman assay. Results: Using a Dutch cohort of patients with SSc and controls we observed an association between two (rs11209032, rs1495965) of the seven tested SNPs and disease susceptibility (allelic p values: p = 0.02 and p = 0.01 respectively). However, a replication study in an independent Spanish cohort did not confirm these findings and reveal no association of any of the IL23R-tested SNP with disease susceptibility or clinical phenotype. Similarly, a meta-analysis considering both populations did not reveal any significant association. In addition, no association was observed between IL23R genetic variants and SSc clinical phenotypes. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the IL23R gene is not associated with SSc susceptibility or clinical phenotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available