4.7 Article

Sex differences in the association between body mass index and total hip or knee joint replacement resulting from osteoarthritis

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages 536-540

Publisher

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2007.086868

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Scientific Foundation of Akureyri Central Hospital
  2. The Swedish Research Council (medicine)
  3. Lund Medical Faculty and University Hospital
  4. King Gustaf V 80-year Fund
  5. The Swedish Rheumatism Association
  6. Kock Foundations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and osteoarthritis (OA) leading to total hip (THR) or knee (TKR) joint replacement. Methods: Case-control study design. All patients still living in Iceland who had had a THR or TKR resulting from OA before the end of 2002 were invited to participate. First-degree relatives of participating patients served as controls. A total of 1473 patients ( 872 women) and 1103 controls ( 599 women), all born between 1910 and 1939 and who had answered a questionnaire including questions about height and weight, were analysed. A randomly selected sample, representative of the Icelandic population, was used as a secondary control group. Results: The OR, adjusted for age, occupation and presence of hand OA, for having a THR was 1.1 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.5) for overweight men and 1.7 ( 95% CI 1.0 to 2.9) for obese men. The OR for having a TKR was 1.7 ( 95% CI 1.1 to 2.6) for overweight men and 5.3 ( 95% CI 2.8 to 10.1) for obese men. The OR for having a THR was 1.0 ( 95% CI 0.8 to 1.3) for overweight women and 1.0 ( 95% CI 0.6 to 1.5) for obese women. The OR for having a TKR was 1.6 ( 95% CI 1.1 to 2.2) for overweight women and 4.0 ( 95% CI 2.6 to 6.1) for obese women. Conclusion: This study supports a positive association between high BMI and TKR in both sexes, but for THR the association with BMI seems to be weaker, and possibly negligible for women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available