4.7 Article

Methylphenidate ('Ritalin') can ameliorate abnormal risk-taking behavior in the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 651-658

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300886

Keywords

orbitofrontal cortex; methylphenidate; risk-taking; decision-making; frontal variant frontotemporal dementia

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G108/653, G0001354, MC_U105559861] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust [019407] Funding Source: Medline
  3. MRC [MC_U105559861, G108/653] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0001354, G0001354B, MC_U105559861, G108/653] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia is a significant neurological condition worldwide. There exist few treatments available for the cognitive and behavioural sequelae of fvFTD. Previous research has shown that these patients display risky decision-making, and numerous studies have now demonstrated pathology affecting the orbitofrontal cortex. The present study uses a within-subjects, double-blind, placebo-controlled procedure to investigate the effects of a single dose of methylphenidate (40 mg) upon a range of different cognitive processes including those assessing prefrontal cortex integrity. Methylphenidate was effective in 'normalizing' the decision-making behavior of patients, such that they became less risk taking on medication, although there were no significant effects on other aspects of cognitive function, including working memory, attentional set shifting, and reversal learning. Moreover, there was an absence of the normal subjective and autonomic responses to methylphenidate seen in elderly subjects. The results are discussed in terms of the 'somatic marker' hypothesis of impaired decision-making following orbitofrontal dysfunction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available