4.4 Article

Inflammatory mediators are altered in the acute phase of posttraumatic complex regional pain syndrome

Journal

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 235-239

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000169669.70523.f0

Keywords

complex regional pain syndrome; reflex dystrophy; inflammation; substance P

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS 1) is a disorder that can affect an extremity after minor trauma or surgery. The pathogenesis of this syndrome is unclear. It has clinical signs of severe local inflammation as a result of an exaggerated inflammatory response, but neurogenic dysregulation also may contribute to it. Methods: For further insights into the pathogenesis of CRPS 1, the authors investigated inflammatory and neurogenic mediators-C-reactive protein (CRP),. interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor I/II (sTNFR I/II), sE-selectin, sL-selectin, sP-selectin, substance P, neuropeptide Y. and calcitonin gene-related peptide-in venous blood from both the healthy arm and the arm with acute CRPS I from 25 patients and from 30 healthy volunteers. Results: Levels of IL-8 and sTNFR I/II were significantly elevated in patients, whereas all soluble forms of selectins were significantly suppressed. There was no significant difference in white blood cell count (WBC), CRP, and IL-6. Substance P was significantly elevated in patients. The other two neuropeptides were unchanged. None of the parameters studied showed any differences between the CRPS I-affected arm and the normal arm. Conclusions: Elevated IL-8 and sTNFR I/II levels indicate an association between CRPS I and an inflammatory process. Normal WBC, CRP, and IL-6 give evidence for localized inflammation. The hypothesis of neurogenic-induced inflammation mediated by neuropeptides is supported by elevated substance P levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available