4.7 Article

Brain mechanisms of expectation associated with insula and amygdala response to aversive taste: Implications for placebo

Journal

BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 120-132

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2005.11.006

Keywords

expectancy; aversion; taste; insula; amygdala; anterior cingulate; orbitofrontal cortex; dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [P30 HD03352] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01-MH74847, T32-MH18931, K05-MH00875, K08-MH63984, MH40747, MH43454, P50-MH52354] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The experience of aversion is shaped by multiple physiological and psychological factors including one's expectations. Recent work has shown that expectancy manipulation can alter perceptions of aversive events and concomitant brain activation. Accruing evidence indicates a primary role of altered expectancies in the placebo effect. Here, we probed the mechanism by which expectation attenuates sensory taste transmission by examining low brain areas activated by misleading information during an expectancy period modulate insula and amygdala activation to a highly aversive bitter taste. In a rapid event-related fMRI design, we showed that activations in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to a misleading cue that the taste would be mildly aversive predicted decreases in insula and amygdala activation to the highly aversive taste. OFC and rACC activation to the misleading cue were also associated with less aversive ratings of that taste. Additional analyses revealed consistent results demonstrating functional connectivity among the OFC, rACC, and insula. Altering expectancies of upcoming aversive events are shown here to depend on robust functional associations among, brain regions implicated in prior work on the placebo effect. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available