4.4 Article

Heart rate variability and performance at two different altitudes in well-trained swimmers

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 226-231

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-865647

Keywords

altitude; heart rate variability; performance

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of training at two different altitudes on heart rate variability (HRV) and performance in well-trained swimmers. Eight national-level male swimmers (age 17.0 +/- 1.8 yrs, weight = 67.0 +/- 6.6 kg, height 180.4 +/- 7.2 cm, VO2max = 60.4 +/- 4.0 ml . min(-1) . kg(-1)) trained 17 days at 1200 m altitude (T-1200), then, after 6 weeks of moderate training at sea level, reproduced the same training plan at 1850 m (T-1850). The training was mainly aerobic with 86% and 84% <= anaerobic threshold for T-1200 and T-1850, respectively. Four HRV analysis tests were performed during T-1200 and T-1850, respectively (pre-test = day 0, test 2 = day 5, test 3 = day 11, post-test = day 17), in supine and standing position. Performance was measured over a 2000-m freestyle test at the altitude of 1200 m. A difference in HRV changes was observed between the two altitudes: during T-1200, addition of parasympathetic and sympathetic activity in supine (TPSU) (p < 0.05) and standing (TPST) (p < 0.05) position, supine parasympathetic activity (HFSU) (p < 0.05), and standing sympathetic activity (LFST) (p < 0.05) were increased and the 2000-m performance was improved (p < 0.05) whereas none of these parameters was changed during T-1850. Change in performance was correlated with increase in HFSU (r = 0.73; p < 0.05) and tended towards correlation with increase in LFST (r = 0.73; p = 0.06). Conclusion: the same training loads induced a positive effect on HRV and performance at 1200 m but not at 1850 m. This may be the consequence of greater stress due to an interaction between greater hypoxic stimulus and the same training loads. These results highlight two opposing effects: aerobic training increases, whereas hypoxia decreases HFSU, due to the correlation between HRV and changes in performance during altitude training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available