4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Extracellular ATP stimulates NO production in rat thick ascending limb

Journal

HYPERTENSION
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 563-567

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000197954.93874.ef

Keywords

nitric oxide; kidney; receptors, purinergic; signal transduction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NO produced by NO synthase (NOS) 3 acts as an autacoid to regulate NaCl absorption in the thick ascending limb. ATP induces NO production by NOS 3 in endothelial cells. We hypothesized that extracellular ATP activates NOS in thick ascending limbs through P2 receptors. To test this, we measured intracellular NO production using the NO-selective fluorescent dye DAF-2 in suspensions of rat medullary thick ascending limbs. We found that ATP increased DAF-2 fluorescence in a concentration-dependent manner, reaching saturation at approximate to 200 mu mol/L with an EC50 of 37 mu mol/L. The increase was blunted by 74% by the nonselective NOS inhibitor L-omega-nitro-arginine-methyl-ester (2 mmol/L; 60 +/- 7 versus 16 +/- 6 arbitrary fluorescence units; P < 0.02; n = 5). In the presence of the P2 receptor antagonist suramin (300 mu mol/L), ATP-induced NO production was reduced by 64% (101 +/- 11 versus 37 +/- 5 arbitrary fluorescence units; P < 0.002; n = 5). Blocking ATP hydrolysis with a 5'-ectonucleotidase inhibitor, ARL67156 (30 mu mol/L) enhanced the response to ATP and shifted the EC50 to 0.8 mu mol/L. In the presence of ARL67156, the EC50 of the P2X-selective agonist beta,gamma-methylene-adenosine 5'-triphosphate was 4.8 mu mol/L and the EC50 for the P2Y- selective agonist UTP was 40.4 mu mol/L. The maximal responses for both agonists were similar. Taken together, these data indicate that ATP stimulates NO production in the thick ascending limb primarily through P2X receptor activation and that ATP hydrolysis may regulate NO production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available