4.7 Article

ErbB-receptors expression and survival in breast carcinoma: A 15-year follow-up study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 206, Issue 3, Pages 702-708

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.20535

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aberrant expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor family has been implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of breast cancer and associated with poor prognosis. To evaluate the prognostic impact of the ErbB receptors expression profile, we analyzed a well-characterized series of 145 primary breast carcinomas for the simultaneous expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER-1), ErbB-2 (HER-2), ErbB-3 (HER-3), and ErbB-4 (HER-4), using immunohistochemistry. Tumors were considered negative or positive for each marker when less than or more than 25% of the cancer cells were immunopositive. Expression of EGFR, ErbB-2, ErbB-3, and ErbB-4 was observed in 31 (21.4%), 65 (44.8%), 72 (49.7%), and 81 (55.9%) of the cases, respectively. There were significant associations between EGFR expression and pT status (P= 0.01), and between ErbB-3 expression and pN (P= 0.003), menopausal (P = 0.01) and PR (P< 0.001) status. The majority of the cases co-expressed two or more receptors. ErbB-3 resulted positive in 51/81 (63.0%) of the ErbB-4 positive cases and ErbB-3/ErbB-4 co-expression was statistically significant (P= 0.0003). As expected, ErbB-2 expression was associated with reduced overall survival at 15 years of follow-up (P= 0.04), even after adjusting for a series of other prognostic factors (P= 0.05). Moreover, cumulative analysis of ErbB-2/3/4 expression showed a strong positive association between higher total ErbB-2/3/4 expression score and worse prognosis (P= 0.002). The simultaneous expression in cancer cells of more than one ErbB receptor identifies a subset of breast cancer patients at high risk for poor survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available