4.6 Article

HLA-A*0201-restricted T cells from humanized NOD mice recognize autoantigens of potential clinical relevance to type 1 diabetes

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 176, Issue 5, Pages 3257-3265

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.5.3257

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA34196, CA13330] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI56374] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK51090, DK46266, DK20541, DK52956, DK64315, DK69280] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In both humans and NOD mice, particular MHC genes are primary contributors to development of the autoreactive CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses against pancreatic beta cells that cause type 1 diabetes (T1D). Association studies have suggested, but not proved, that the RLA-A*0201 MHC class I variant is an important contributor to T1D in humans. In this study, we show that transgenic expression in NOD mice of HLA-A*0201, in the absence of murine class I MHC molecules, is sufficient to mediate autoreactive CD8(+) T cell responses contributing to T1D development. CD8(+) T cells from the transgenic mice are cytotoxic to murine and human HLA-A*0201-positive islet cells. Hence, the murine and human islets must present one or more peptides in common. Islet-specific glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit-related protein (IGRP) is one of several important T1D autoantigens in standard NOD mice. Three IGRP-derived peptides were identified as targets of diabetogenic HLA-A*0201-restricted T cells in our NOD transgenic stock. Collectively, these results indicate the utility of humanized HLA-A*0201-expressing NOD mice in the identification of T cells and autoantigens of potential relevance to human T1D. In particular, the identified antigenic peptides represent promising tools to explore the potential importance of IGRP in the development of human T1D.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available