4.4 Article

Estimation of heritability of the nectar guide of flowers in Brassica rapa L.

Journal

BREEDING SCIENCE
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 75-79

Publisher

JAPANESE SOC BREEDING
DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.56.75

Keywords

Brassica rapa; heritability; ultraviolet; F-1 hybrid; image analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flowers of Brassica rapa L. produce a nectar guide, which consists of a coloured pattern (the dark, UV-absorbing centre of the flower) invisible to humans but visible to insect pollinators. As a result, the colour of the flowers typically appears as uniform light yellow to human eyes. The objective of the present study was to investigate the mode of inheritance of this character by using two inbred lines and their F-1, F-2 and F-3 progenies with a view to improving this character. After digitizing UV-photographs of each flower, we measured the UV-absorbing area (UVA) and the total flower area (FA), based on image analysis. The ratio of UVA to FA represented the UV colour proportion (UVP). We estimated the broad-sense and narrow-sense heritabilities from within-generation variances in the UVP scores and environmental variance from the average value of the variances in the parental lines. The value of broad-sense heritability of UVP was high (0.75) in the F-2 generation (h(B)(2)[F-2]) and higher (0.84) in the F-3 generation (h(B)(2)[F-3]), indicating that UVP is a heritable character. Moreover, the high value of broad-sense heritability of UVP indicates that breeders have not focused their selection intentionally on this character in B. rapa. In contrast, the value of narrow-sense heritability was much lower: 0.12 (h(N)(2)[F-2]) and 0.24 (h(N)(2)[F-3]), respectively, suggesting that the genetic variation in UVP was mainly due to dominance effects. If we attempt to breed new lines with larger or smaller UVP values, we need to select this trait in advanced generations, in which additive effects become larger.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available