4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Chemosensitization of tumors by resveratrol

Journal

RESVERATROL AND HEALTH
Volume 1215, Issue -, Pages 150-160

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05852.x

Keywords

apoptosis; cancer therapy; chemoresistance; chemosensitization; resveratrol; tumor

Funding

  1. Clayton Foundation for Research
  2. National Institutes of Health [CA-16 672, NIH CA-124787-01A2]
  3. Center for Targeted Therapy of M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA016672, P01CA124787, R01CA026582] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because tumors develop resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, the cancer research community continues to search for effective chemosensitizers. One promising possibility is to use dietary agents that sensitize tumors to the chemotherapeutics. In this review, we discuss that the use of resveratrol can sensitize tumor cells to chemotherapeutic agents. The tumors shown to be sensitized by resveratrol include lung carcinoma, acute myeloid leukemia, promyelocytic leukemia, multiple myeloma, prostate cancer, oral epidermoid carcinoma, and pancreatic cancer. The chemotherapeutic agents include vincristine, adriamycin, paclitaxel, doxorubicin, cisplatin, gefitinib, 5-fluorouracil, velcade, and gemcitabine. The chemosensitization of tumor cells by resveratrol appears to be mediated through its ability to modulate multiple cell-signaling molecules, including drug transporters, cell survival proteins, cell proliferative proteins, and members of the NF-kappa B and STAT3 signaling pathways. Interestingly, this nutraceutical has also been reported to suppress apoptosis induced by paclitaxel, vincristine, and daunorubicin in some tumor cells. The potential mechanisms underlying this dual effect are discussed. Overall, studies suggest that resveratrol can be used to sensitize tumors to standard cancer chemotherapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available