4.6 Article

Very Large Telescope three micron spectra of dust-enshrouded red giants in the Large Magellanic Cloud

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 447, Issue 3, Pages 971-989

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054222

Keywords

stars : carbon; stars : AGB and post-AGB; circumstellar matter; stars : mass-loss; Magellanic Clouds; infrared : stars

Funding

  1. STFC [PP/D000955/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D000955/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present ESO/VLT spectra in the 2.9-4.1 mu m range for a large sample of infrared stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), selected on the basis of MSX and 2MASS colours to be extremely dust-enshrouded AGB star candidates. Out of 30 targets, 28 are positively identified as carbon stars, significantly adding to the known population of optically invisible carbon stars in the LMC. We also present spectra for six IR-bright stars in or near three clusters in the LMC, identifying four of them as carbon stars and two as oxygen-rich supergiants. We analyse the molecular bands of C2H2 at 3.1 and 3.8 mu m, HCN at 3.57 mu m, and sharp absorption features in the 3.70-3.78 mu m region that we attribute to C2H2. There is evidence for a generally high abundance of C2H2 in LMC carbon stars, suggestive of high carbon-to-oxygen abundance ratios at the low metallicity in the LMC. The low initial metallicity is also likely to have resulted in less abundant HCN and CS. The sample of IR carbon stars exhibits a range in C2H2:HCN abundance ratio. We do not find strong correlations between the properties of the molecular atmosphere and circumstellar dust envelope, but the observed differences in the strengths and shapes of the absorption bands can be explained by differences in excitation temperature. High mass-loss rates and strong pulsation would then be seen to be associated with a large scale height of the molecular atmosphere.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available