4.5 Article

Volume-related and volume-independent effects of posture on esophageal and transpulmonary pressures in healthy subjects

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages 753-758

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00697.2005

Keywords

respiratory mechanics; chest wall; esophageal balloon; supine posture

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-52586] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ventilator management decisions in acute lung injury could be better informed with knowledge of the patient's transpulmonary pressure, which can be estimated using measurements of esophageal pressure. Esophageal manometry is seldom used for this, however, in part because of a presumed postural artifact in the supine position. Here, we characterize the magnitude and variability of postural effects on esophageal pressure in healthy subjects to better assess its significance in patients with acute lung injury. We measured the posture-related changes in relaxation volume and total lung capacity in 10 healthy subjects in four postures: upright, supine, prone, and left lateral decubitus. Then, in the same subjects, we measured static pressure-volume characteristics of the lung over a wide range of lung volumes in each posture by using an esophageal balloon catheter. Transpulmonary pressure during relaxation (PLrel) averaged 3.7 (SD 2.0) cmH(2)O upright and -3.3 (SD 3.2) cmH(2)O supine. Approximately 58% of the decrease in PLrel between the upright and supine postures was due to a corresponding decrease in relaxation volume. The remaining 2.9cmH(2)O difference is consistent with reported values of a presumed postural artifact. Relaxation volumes and pressures in prone and lateral postures were intermediate. To correct estimated transpulmonary pressure for the effect of lying supine, we suggest adding 3 cmH(2)O (95% confidence interval: -1 to +7 cmH(2)O). We conclude that postural differences in estimated transpulmonary pressure at a given lung volume are small compared with the substantial range of PLrel in patients with acute lung injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available