4.6 Article

Effectiveness of neuronavigation in resecting solitary intracerebral contrast-enhancing tumors: a randomized controlled trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
Volume 104, Issue 3, Pages 360-368

Publisher

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2006.104.3.360

Keywords

frameless stereotaxy; image-guided neurosurgery; glioblastoma multiforme; cytoreduction; gross-total removal; prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Object. The goal of this Study was to assess the impact of neuronavigation oil the cytoreductive treatment of solitary contrast-enhancing intracerebral tumors and Outcomes of this treatment in cases in which neuronavigation was preoperatively judged to be redundant. Methods. The authors conducted a prospective randomized study in which 45 patients, each harboring a solitary contrast-enhancing intracerebral tumor, were randomized for surgery with or without neuronavigation. Peri- and post-operative parameters under investigation included the following: duration of the procedure; surgeon's estimate of the usefulness of neuronavigation; quantification of the extent of resection, determined using magnetic resonance imaging; and the postoperative course, as evaluated by neurological examinations, the patient's quality-of-life self-assessment, application of the Barthel index and the Karnofsky Performance Scale score, and the patient's time of death. The mean amount of residual tumor tissue was 28.9% for standard Surgery (SS) and 13.8% for surgery involving neuronavigation (SN). The corresponding mean amounts of residual contrast-enhancing tumor tissue were 29.2 and 24.4%, respectively. These differences were not significant. Gross-total removal (GTR) was achieved in five patients who underwent SS and in three who underwent SN. Median survival was significantly shorter in the SN group (5.6 months compared with 9 months, unadjusted hazard ratio = 1.6): however, this difference may be attributable to the coincidental early death of three patients in the SN group. No discernible important effect oil the patients' 3-month postoperative course was identified. Conclusions. There is no rationale for the routine use of neuronavigation to improve the extent of tumor resection and prognosis in patients harboring a solitary enhancing intracerebral lesion when neuronavigation is not already deemed advantageous because of the size or location of the lesion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available