4.4 Article

Observations on the behavior of vitreous ice at ∼82 and ∼12K

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
Volume 153, Issue 3, Pages 241-252

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.12.003

Keywords

liquid helium; radiation damage; vitreous ice; amorphous ice; cryoelectron microscopy

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [P01 GM66521] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In an attempt to determine why cooling with liquid helium actually proved disadvantageous in our electron cryotomography experiments, further tests were performed to explore the differences in vitreous ice at similar to 82 and similar to 12 K. Electron diffraction patterns showed clearly that the vitreous ice of interest in biological electron cryomicroscopy (i.e., plunge-frozen, buffered protein solutions) does indeed collapse into a higher density phase when irradiated with as few as 2-3 e-angstrom(2) at similar to 12 K. The high density phase spontaneously expanded back to a state resembling the original, low density phase over a period of hours at similar to 82 K. Movements of gold fiducials and changes in the lengths of tunnels drilled through the ice confirmed these phase changes, and also revealed gross changes in the concavity of the ice layer spanning circular holes in the carbon support. Brief warmup-cooldown cycles from similar to 12 to similar to 82 K and back, as would be required by the flip-flop cryorotation stage, did not induce a global phase change, but did allow certain local strains to relax. Several observations including the rates of tunnel collapse and the production of beam footprints suggested that the high density phase flows more readily in response to irradiation. Finally, the patterns of bubbling were different at the two temperatures. It is concluded that the collapse of vitreous ice at similar to 12 K around macromolecules is too rapid to account alone for the problematic loss of contrast seen, which must instead be due to secondary effects such as changes in the mobility of radiolytic fragments and water. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available