4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of antiresorptive agents on osteomyelitis Novel insights into the pathogenesis of osteonecrosis of the jaw

Journal

SKELETAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 1192, Issue -, Pages 84-94

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05210.x

Keywords

osteomyelitis; antiresorptive therapy; TNFR:Fc

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Defense [06136016, 99853]
  2. National Institutes of Health [AR48681, DE17096, AR52674, AR51469, AR46545, AR54041, AR53459]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR052674, R01AR048697, T32AR053459, P50AR054041, R01AR048681, R01AR046545, R01AR051469] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL &CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R21DE017096] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of antiresorptive agents (e.g., alendronate [Aln], osteoprotegerin [OPG]) on bone infection are unknown. Thus, their effects on implant-associated osteomyelitis (OM) were investigated in mice using PBS (placebo), gentamycin, and etanercept (TNFR:Fc) controls. None of the drugs affected humoral immunity, angiogenesis, or chronic infection. However, the significant (P < 0.05 vs. PBS) inhibition of cortical osteolysis and decreased draining lymph node size in Aln- and OPG-treated mice was associated with a significant (P < 0.05) increase in the incidence of high-grade infections during the establishment of OM. In contrast, the high-grade infections in TNFR:Fc-treated mice were associated with immunosuppression, as evidenced by the absence of granulomas and presence of Gram(+) biofilm in the bone marrow. Collectively, these findings indicate that although antiresorptive agents do not exacerbate chronic OM, they can increase the bacterial load during early infection by decreasing lymphatic drainage and preventing the removal of necrotic bone that harbors the bacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available