4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Life history context of reproductive aging in a wild primate model

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE AGING
Volume 1204, Issue -, Pages 127-138

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05531.x

Keywords

reproductive aging; baboons; toothwear; body condition; steroid hormones; senescence

Funding

  1. NSF [IBN-0322613, NSF BSE-0323553, RO3 MH65294, NIA P30AG024361]
  2. Chicago Zoological Society
  3. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R24HD047879] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R03MH065294] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG034513, P30AG024361] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pace of reproductive aging has been of considerable interest, especially in regard to the long postreproductive period in modern women. Here we use data for both sexes from a 37-year longitudinal study of a wild baboon population to place reproductive aging within a life history context for this species, a primate relative of humans that evolved in the same savannah habitat as humans did. We examine the patterns and pace of reproductive aging, including birth rates and reproductive hormones for both sexes, and compare reproductive aging to age-related changes in several other traits. Reproductive senescence occurs later in baboon females than males. Delayed senescence in females relative to males is also found in several other traits, such as dominance status and body condition, but not in molar wear or glucocorticoid profiles. Survival, health, and well-being are the product of risk factors in morphological, physiological, and behavioral traits that differ in rate of senescence and in dependence on social or ecological conditions; some will be very sensitive to differences in circumstances and others less so.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available