4.7 Article

Interferon-γ induces major histocompatibility class II transactivator (CIITA), which mediates collagen repression and major histocompatibility class II activation by human aortic smooth muscle cells

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages 472-479

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000204725.46332.97

Keywords

collagen; CIITA isoform; RFX; MHC II; SMCs

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL013262, R01 HL068094, P01-HL013262-31] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic inflammation in atherosclerosis is responsible for plaque instability through alterations in extracellular matrix. Previously, we demonstrated that major histocompatibility class II ( MHC II) transactivator ( CIITA) in a complex with regulatory factor for X box 5 ( RFX5) is a crucial protein mediating interferon (IFN)-gamma-induced repression of collagen type I gene transcription in fibroblasts. This article demonstrates that, in smooth muscle cells (SMCs), IFN-gamma dramatically increases the expression of CIITA isoforms III and IV, with no increase in expression of CIITA isoform I. Expression of CIITA III and IV correlates with decreased collagen type I and increased MHC II gene expression. Exogenous expression of CIITA I, III, and IV, in transiently transfected SMCs, represses collagen type I promoters (COL1A1 and COL1A2) and activates MHC II promoter. Levels of CIITA and RFX5 increase in the nucleus of cells treated with IFN-gamma. Moreover, simvastatin lowers the IFN-gamma-induced expression of RFX5 and MHC II in addition to repressing collagen expression. However, simvastatin does not block the IFN-gamma-induced expression of CIITA III and IV, suggesting a CIITA-independent mechanism. This first demonstration that RFX5 and CIITA isoforms are expressed in SMCs after IFN-gamma stimulation suggest that CIITA could be a key factor in plaque stability in atherosclerosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available