4.6 Article

Variation of column-integrated aerosol properties in a Chinese urban region

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 111, Issue D5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2005JD006203

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[1] Thirty-three months of aerosol data in Beijing are presented in this paper. Aerosol optical thickness (AOT) increases from January to June and then decreases gradually. However, airborne particulate matter with diameter less than 10 mu m (PM10) concentration exhibits higher values in winter and spring and lower concentration in summer. For the same PM10 concentration, AOT in summer is approximately two, three, and four times that in autumn, winter, and spring, respectively. AOT increases persistently during daytime, and the diurnal variation varies from about 15% in summer to about 45% in winter. The seasonal and diurnal variation of AOT is quite different from that of surface particle concentration. This is partly attributed to the variation of atmospheric mixing layer height. Aerosol volume concentrations increase with AOT by nearly identical magnitude for fine and coarse mode except in spring. The volume concentration of coarse mode in spring increases by a magnitude of more than two times that derived in remaining seasons. Aerosol fine mode radius increases with AOT, whereas coarse mode radius keeps relatively invariable with AOT. Mean aerosol single-scattering albedo at 440 nm is about 0.90 and decreases slightly with wavelength. Aerosol single-scattering albedos increase and their spectral dependence reverses during dust periods. Aerosol size and absorption in Beijing are close to results derived in Mexico City and Kanpur, but they are quite different from those in Maryland and Paris. Therefore different urban aerosol models should be created and used in satellite remote sensing in different urban regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available