4.7 Review

The broken balance in aspirin hypersensitivity

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 533, Issue 1-3, Pages 145-155

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.12.053

Keywords

aspirin hypersensitivity; cyclooxygenase; non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug; cysteinyl leukotriene; lipoxin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aspirin was introduced into medicine over a century ago and has become the most popular drug in the world. Although the first hypersensitivity reaction was described soon after aspirin had been marketed, only recently a phenomenon of cysteinyl leukotriene overproduction brought new insights oil a balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators derived from arachidonic acid. We describe the most common clinical presentations of aspirin hypersensitivity, i.e. aspirin-induced asthma, rhinosinusitis and aspirin-induced urticaria. We also present their biochemical background. Despite relatively high incidence of these reactions, aspirin hypersensitivity remains underdiagnosed worldwide. Acute reactions of aspirin hypersensitivity are elicited via cyclooxygenase inhibition by non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs. Coxibs, selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 isoenzyme, do not precipitate symptoms in susceptible patients. Though hypersensitivity correlates with cyclooxygenase-1 inhibition, diminished tissue expression was described only for cyclooxygenase-2. Aspirin-induced asthma and aspirin-induced urticaria, in a Substantial part of the patients, are driven by a release of mediators from activated mast cells. These cells in physiological conditions are under inhibitory control of prostaglandin E-2. The origin of aspirin hypersensitivity remains unknown, but accumulating data from genetic studies strongly Suggest that environmental factor, possibly a common viral infection, can trigger the disease in susceptible subjects. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available