4.4 Article

Fluorescence imaging of blood-brain barrier disruption

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 151, Issue 2, Pages 262-267

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.08.006

Keywords

blood-brain barrier; neurovascular unit; permeability; fluorescence; in situ brain perfusion; sodium fluorescein; Evans blue albumin; confocal microscopy

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01-DK065003] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pathological alterations of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) can be topographically heterogeneous. The goal of this study was to develop a method to assess rapidly the magnitude and spatial distribution of permeability changes. Rats were perfused via the common carotid arteries with Ringer's solution containing sodium fluorescein (NF) and Evans Blue albumin (EB). Global NF uptake was determined by fluorimetry and EB uptake was determined by absorbance spectroscopy. NF uptake was linear in control animals and at a rate comparable to sucrose, whereas uptake of EB was negligible. Infusion of 1.6 M mannitol immediately prior to perfusion significantly increased uptake of NF while EB uptake was unchanged. BBB disruption was confirmed by confocal microscopy of fresh-frozen sections. In control animals, NF and EB staining were limited to the edges of slices and to the circumventricular organs. In mannitol-treated animals, heavy NF staining was observed throughout the brain, and EB, staining was localized around some microvessels. In animals given a similar to 500 mu l air embolus prior to perfusion, a discrete area of NF and EB staining could be observed near the ventral midline, while the rest of the brain remained unaltered. We find that brain perfusion with NF/EB enables a rapid, reliable, and highly sensitive assessment of global BBB permeability and microscopic visualization of discrete BBB disruptions. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available