4.7 Article

Determination of hexavalent chromium in exhaled breath condensate and environmental air among chrome plating workers

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 562, Issue 2, Pages 229-235

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.01.065

Keywords

Cr(VI); speciation; exhaled breath condensate; ETAAS; chrome plating

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL072323-04, R01 HL072323] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chromium speciation has attracted attention because of the different toxicity of Cr(III), which is considered relatively non-toxic, and Cr(VI), which can cross cell membranes mainly as a chromate anion and has been classified as a class I human carcinogen. The aims of the present study were to measure soluble Cr(VI) levels in environmental samples, to develop a simple method of quantifying Cr(VI) in exhaled breath condensate (EBC), and to follow the kinetics of EBC Cr(VI) in chrome plating workers. Personal air samples were collected from 10 chrome platers; EBC was collected from the same workers immediately after the work shift on Tuesday and before the work shift on the following Wednesday. Environmental and EBC Cr(VI) levels were determined by means of colorimetry and electrothermal absorption atomic spectrometry, respectively. The method of detecting Cr(VI) in environmental air was based on the extraction of the Cr(VI)-diphenylcarbazide (Cr(VI)-DPC) complex in 1-butanol. whereas EBC Cr(VI) was determined using a solvent extraction of Cr(VI) as an ion pair with tetrabutyl ammonium ion, and subsequent direct determination of the complex (Cr(VI)-DPC) in EBC. Kinetic data showed that airborne Cr(VI) was reduced by 50% in airway lining fluid sampled at the end of exposure and that there was a further 50% reduction after about 15 h. The persistence of Cr(VI) in EBC supports the use of EBC in assessing target tissue levels of Cr(VI). (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available