4.7 Article

Influence of alcohol consumption and gene polymorphisms of ADH2 and ALDH2 on hepatocellular carcinoma in a Japanese population

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 118, Issue 6, Pages 1501-1507

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21505

Keywords

alcohol; ADH2; ALDH2; polymorphisms; hepatocellular carcinoma

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although alcohol intake as well as hepatitis viruses has been associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), gene-alcohol interactions on HCC risk remain to be elucidated. We conducted a case-control study to examine whether polymorphisms of alcohol dehydrogenase 2 (ADH2) and aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) modified the HCC risk depending on the amount of alcohol intake. ADH2 and ALDH2 genotyping was performed by a duplex polymerase chain reaction with confronting two-pair primers in 269 newly diagnosed HCC cases and 2 different controls [275 hospital controls and 381 patients with chronic liver disease (CLD)]. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that heavy drinkers consuming >= 3 gos/dav of sake (69 g of ethanol/day) showed an increased-risk of HCC based on comparison of HCC cases with hospital controls [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 13.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3-54.3] or CLD patients (adjusted OR = 7.0; 95% CI 2.5-19.2), whereas the overall risk was not elevated among light to moderate drinkers consuming < 3 gos/day. Interestingly, light to moderate drinking was associated with an increased risk among those with ALDH2*1/*2 (adjusted OR = 4.5 or 2.0), but not among those with ALDH2*1/*1 (adjusted OR 0.8 or 1.0; p interaction = 0.03 or 0.13). However, this gene-alcohol interaction was not observed for heavy drinking. Among light to moderate drinkers, people with the combination of ALDH2*1/*2 and ADH2*2/*2 revealed the highest risk of HCC. These findings indicate that the ALDH2 polymorphism may modify HCC risk among light to moderate drinkers. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss. Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available