4.6 Article

Differential MHC class II presentation of a pathogenic autoantigen during health and disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 176, Issue 6, Pages 3438-3448

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.6.3438

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 031238] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR 051980] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [HD 01487, HD 00850] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI) is the target autoantigen recognized by KRN T cells in the K/BxN model of rheumatoid arthritis. T cell reactivity to this ubiquitous Ag results in the recruitment of anti-GPI B cells and subsequent immune complex-mediated arthritis. Because all APCs have the capacity to process and present this autoantigen, it is unclear why systemic autoimmunity with polyclonal B cell activation does not ensue. To this end, we examined how GPI is presented by B cells relative to other immunologically relevant APCs such as dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages in the steady state, during different phases of arthritis development, and after TLR stimulation. Although all APCs can process and present the GPI:I-A 97 complex, they do so with different efficiencies. DCs are the most potent at baseline and become progressively more potent with disease development correlating with immune complex uptake. Interestingly, in vivo and in vitro maturation of DCs did not enhance GPI presentation, suggesting that DCs use mechanisms to regulate the presentation of self-peptides. Non-GPI-specific B cells are the weakest APCs (100-fold less potent than DCs) and fail to productively engage KRN T cells at steady state and during arthritis. However, the ability to stimulate KRN T cells is strongly enhanced in B cells after TLR ligation and provides a mechanism whereby polyclonal B cells may be activated in the wake of an acute infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available