4.7 Article

Constraining global properties of the Draco dwarf spheroidal galaxy

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 640, Issue 1, Pages 252-269

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1086/499940

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : individual (Draco dwarf spheroidal); stellar dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By fitting a flexible stellar anisotropy model to the observed surface brightness and line-of-sight velocity dispersion profiles of Draco we derive a sequence of cosmologically plausible two-component (stars + dark matter) models for this galaxy. The models are consistent with all the available observations and can have either cuspy Navarro-Frenk-White or flat-cored dark matter density profiles. The dark matter halos either formed relatively recently (at z similar to 2-7) and are massive (up to similar to 5 x 10(9) M-circle dot), or formed before the end of the reionization of the universe (z similar to 7-11) and are less massive (down to similar to 7 x 10(7) M-circle dot). Our results thus support either of the two popular solutions of the missing satellites'' problem of Lambda cold dark matter cosmology-that dwarf spheroidals are either very massive or very old. We carry out high-resolution simulations of the tidal evolution of our two-component Draco models in the potential of the Milky Way. The results of our simulations suggest that the observable properties of Draco have not been appreciably affected by the Galactic tides after 10 Gyr of evolution. We rule out Draco being a tidal dwarf''-a tidally disrupted dwarf galaxy. Almost radial Draco orbits (with the pericentric distance less than or similar to 15 kpc) are also ruled out by our analysis. The case of a harmonic dark matter core can be consistent with observations only for a very limited choice of Draco orbits (with the apocentric-to-pericentric distances ratio of less than or similar to 2.5).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available