4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Phase II study of pemetrexed plus carboplatin in malignant pleural mesothelioma

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 1443-1448

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.3190

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose This multicenter, phase II clinical study was conducted to evaluate the activity of the combination of pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable disease and adequate organ function, who were not eligible for curative surgery, received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve of 5 mg/mL/min, administered intravenously every 21 days. All patients received folic acid and vitamin B-12 Supplementation, Pemetrexed was provided within the Expanded Access Program. Results A total of 102 patients were enrolled. An objective response was achieved in 19 patients (two complete and 17 partial responses), for a response rate of 18.6% (95% Cl, 11.6% to 27.5%). Forty-eight patients (47.0%; 95% Cl, 37.1% to 57.2%) had stable disease after treatment. Overall, 67 patients (65.7%) achieved disease control (95% Cl, 55.6% to 74.8%). Median time to progression was 6.5 months; median overall survival time was 12.7 months. Compliance to treatment was excellent, with a relative dose-intensity of 97% for pemetrexed and 98% for carboplatin. Toxicity was mild, with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurring in 9.7% of total cycles and grade 3 or 4 anemia occurring in 3.5% of total cycles, Nonhematologic toxicity was negligible. Conclusion Treatment with pemetrexed and carboplatin was active and well tolerated in patients with MPM. Disease control rate, time to disease progression, and overall survival were similar to the results achieved with the standard regimen of pemetrexed and cisplatin, suggesting that the carboplatin combination could be an alternative option for these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available