4.4 Article

Enfuvirtide plasma levels and injection site reactions using a needle-free gas-powered injection system (Biojector)

Journal

AIDS
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 719-723

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.aids.0000216372.53819.db

Keywords

enfuvirtide; subcutaneous injection; injection site reaction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To assess the use of the Biojector B2000 needle-free gas-powered injection system for subcutaneous administration of enfuvirtide in HIV-infected patients and to compare this system with standard needles and syringes with respect to ease of use, severity of injection site reactions (ISR), and enfuvirtide plasma levels. Design: An observational study among 32 treatment-experienced HIV clinic patients receiving enfuvirtide. Methods: Adult patients were assessed before and after switching from standard needles to the Biojector for enfuvirtide administration. Patients used the Biojector for LIP to 24 weeks and rated ease of use from 0 (easy) to 3 (difficult). ISR were graded from 0 to 31 for signs and symptoms (erythema, induration, pruritus, nodules/cysts, ecchymosis), duration of individual lesions, and number of lesions. Plasma was collected pre-dose and 1 h post-dose for enfuvirtide measurement. The high-pressure liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method used was specific for enfuvirtide over its known plasma metabolite. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare needle-based and Biojector outcomes. Results: The Biojector was rated as being significantly easier to use (P < 0.001) and reduced the occurrence of ISR compared with standard needles (P < 0.001). Enfuvirtide plasma levels were not statistically different between the two administration methods at either pre-dose trough (P = 0.41) or 1 h post-close (P = 0.74). Conclusions: The Biojector needle-free injection system was easy to use for enfuvirtide administration and was associated with a decreased severity of ISR. Plasma enfuvirtide levels pre-dose and 1h post-dose were comparable when injecting with standard needles or the Biojector. (C) 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available