4.7 Article

Comparative study between probiotic bacterium Arthrobacter XE-7 and chloramphenicol on protection of Penaeus chinensis post-larvae from pathogenic vibrios

Journal

AQUACULTURE
Volume 253, Issue 1-4, Pages 140-147

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.07.040

Keywords

Arthrobacter; chloramphenicol; Penaeus chinensis; Vibrio; probiotics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A strain of Arthrobacter XE-7, isolated from Penaeus chinensis was evaluated for potential use as a probiotic for shrimp post-larvae. In vitro studies demonstrated antagonism against Vibrio parahaemolyticus, vibrio anguillarum and Vibrio nereis. During the 14-day challenge experiment, the shrimp post-larvae aged 10 days were reared in water with addition of either Arthrobacter XE-7 (10(6) CFU/ml), chloramphenicol (2 mg/l) or the three pathogenic vibrios (106 CFU/ml): Controls, (V) pathogenic vibrios alone, (A) Arthrobacter XE-7 alone, (C) chloramphenicol alone, (AV) pathogenic vibrios in combination with Arthrobacter XE-7, and (CV) pathogenic vibrios in combination with chloramphenicol. The surface growth rate of nitrogen and the attenuation rate of bacterium in culture water were detected for the first 7 days, and the cumulative mortality was recorded for the whole challenge experiment. Treatment A had no significant higher survival than the Control. However, Treatment AV produced significantly higher survival than Treatment V (p < 0.05); Furthermore, it was not significantly lower than those of Treatment CV Comparable attenuation rate of vibrios was observed in Treatment AV and CV, and it was significantly lower than that in Treatment V (p < 0.05). In addition, results of the surface growth rate of nitrogen show that the Arthrobacter XE-7 has the nitrification ability to oxidize ammonium to nitrite. Both chloramphenicol and Arthrobacter XE-7 are able to comparably protect the shrimp post-larvae from the pathogenic vibrios. Then, Arthrobacter XE-7 can be regarded as a probiotic bacterium for the culture of shrimp larvae. (C) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available