4.3 Article

Axonal damage markers in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with clinically isolated syndrome improve predicting conversion to definite multiple sclerosis

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 143-148

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1191/135248506ms1263oa

Keywords

axonal damage; cerebrospinal fluid; clinically isolated syndrome; multiple sclerosis; neurofilaments; tau protein

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) represents the earliest phase of multiple sclerosis ( MS). This study tested whether biomarkers for axonal degeneration can improve upon sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in predicting conversion from CIS to MS. Patients with CIS ( n = 52), relapsing-remitting MS ( RRMS, n = 38) and age-matched controls ( n = 25) were included. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of tau and neurofilaments (NfH(SMI35)) were measured using ELISA. The MRI T2-lesion load and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were recorded. CSF tau and NfH(SMI35) were elevated in CIS compared to controls (P< 0.05). RRMS patients with acute relapse had higher NfH(SMI35) levels than stable patients. Tau and NfH(SMI35) levels correlated with EDSS in CIS and RRMS. In RRMS, the number of T2-lesions correlated with tau levels ( R = 0.53, P = 0.01). The sensitivity predicting the conversion from CIS to MS was higher for the combination of CSF markers ( either tau or NfH(SMI35) elevated) than for MRI ( 40 versus 34%), but could be further increased to 60% if CSF and MRI criteria were combined. Similarly, the combination of tau and NfH(SMI35) showed higher specificity (94%) than MRI (82%). Tau and NfHSMI35 are valuable biomarkers for axonal damage in the CIS patients. Predicting conversion from CIS to MS can be improved if CSF markers are combined with MRI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available