4.7 Article

Pitfalls in the analysis of brominated flame retardants in environmental, human and food samples - including results of three international interlaboratory studies

Journal

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 364-372

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2006.01.008

Keywords

brominated flame retardant; hexabromocyclododecane; interlaboratory study; polybrominated diphenyl ether; tetrabromobisphenol-A

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the beginning of this century, an increasing number of laboratories have become involved in the analysis of brominated flame retardants (BFRs) in the environment, humans and food. To assure as well as improve the quality of these analyses, a series of international interlaboratory exercises has been organized. It appeared that the differences between the BFRs create more difficulties for their analysis than, for example, that of polychlorinated biphenyls. Problems that arise with the determination of decabromodiphenyl ether and hexabromocyclododecane, due to instability at higher temperatures, high background values and other factors, make their analysis much more demanding than, for example, that of 2,4,2',4'-tetrabromodiphenyl-ether. A number of these pitfalls can be identified from the evaluation of the interlaboratory study results. We propose analytical solutions for these problems. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available