4.3 Article

Autobiographical memories and views of the future: In relation to dysphoria

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 107-116

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207590500188025

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study investigated dysphoric individuals' self-referential processing of autobiographical memories and future personal events, in relation to specificity and response latency. Dysphoric individuals (n = 17) and nondysphoric controls (n = 17) were selected from a larger sample based on self-reported depression. Participants completed an autobiographical memory task (AMT) and a future event task (FET), using pleasant and unpleasant (anxiety-relevant, depression-relevant) emotional word cues. In response to each emotional cue, participants were required to access and write down a specific personal memory and future event, respectively. Consistent with the hypotheses, dysphoric individuals were less specific in describing pleasant and unpleasant experiences (particularly pleasant), irrespective of time condition. As expected, dysphoric individuals' specificity for distinct depression-relevant and anxiety-relevant experiences did not differ significantly. As predicted, all participants were less specific in describing future personal events than in recalling personal memories. As predicted, dysphoric individuals took longer to think of pleasant memories and pleasant future experiences than controls but, as expected, groups did not differ significantly on mean reaction times for past and future unpleasant experiences. Overall, the data showed a degree of consistency in participants' past and future-oriented processing of self-referential material. Although considerable research has investigated autobiographical memories in relation to emotional disturbance, the present findings suggest that constructing future emotional experiences is also an important aspect of mental health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available