4.7 Article

Low Lymph Node Retrieval After Preoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer is Associated with Improved Prognosis in Patients with a Good Tumor Response

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 2075-2081

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4235-z

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To examine the association between the number of lymph nodes retrieved and oncologic outcome after preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer according to tumor regression grade. Patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative surgery between May 2004 and December 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Using multivariate analysis, the correlation between clinicopathologic variables and the number of lymph nodes retrieved was evaluated. The associations between the oncologic outcome and number of lymph nodes retrieved were also investigated according to the tumor regression grade. In total, 1,332 patients were identified, of whom 433 (32.8 %) received preoperative chemoradiation. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative chemoradiation was an independent predictor of the number of lymph nodes retrieved (P = 0.002). After chemoradiation, the number of total and positive lymph nodes retrieved was inversely correlated with tumor regression. Retrieval of a parts per thousand yen12 lymph nodes was not an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival; however, among patients with a good tumor response, those with < 12 lymph nodes retrieved had a significantly better 3-year disease-free survival (P = 0.030) than those with a parts per thousand yen12 lymph nodes retrieved. Reduced lymph node yield after preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer does not indicate inadequate oncologic surgery. It may represent good treatment response and better prognosis, especially in patients with good pathologic tumor regression after chemoradiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available