4.6 Article

Impairment of the intestinal barrier by ethanol involves enteric microflora and mast cell activation in rodents

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 168, Issue 4, Pages 1148-1154

Publisher

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050617

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Alcohol hepatic toxicity in heavy drinkers is associated with high endotoxin blood levels and increased intestinal permeability. Because endotoxins can cross damaged mucosa, we investigated the mechanisms through which ethanol impairs the colonic epithelium of rats submitted to acute alcohol intake. Colonic permeability to Cr-51-ethylenediamintetraacetic acid was increased 24 hours after 3.0 g/kg ethanol intake (3.2 +/- 0.2% versus 2.2 +/- 0.2%) and was associated with significant endotoxemia. Antibiotics and doxantrazole (a Mast cell membrane stabilizer) significantly inhibited the effect of ethanol. Two hours after intake, plasma concentrations of ethanol were twofold higher in antibiotic-treated rats than in controls (155.8 +/- 9.3 mg/dl versus 75.7 +/- 7.6 mg/dl, P < 0.001). Lumenal concentrations of acetaldehyde were markedly increased after ethanol intake (132.6 +/- 31.6 mu mol/L versus 20.8 +/- 1.4 mu mol/L, P < 0.05) and antibiotics diminished this increase (86.2 +/- 10.9 mu mol/L). in colonic samples mounted in Ussing chambers, acetaklehyde but not ethanol increased dextran flux across the mucosa by 54%. Doxantrazole inhibited the effect of acetaklehyde. This study demonstrates that an acute and moderate ethanol intake alters the epithelial barrier through ethanol oxidation into acetaklehyde by the colonic microflora. and downstream mast cell activation. Such alterations that remain for longer periods could result in excessive endotoxin passage, which could explain the subsequent endotoxemia frequently observed in patients with alcoholic liver disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available