4.5 Article

Grain orientations and grain boundary networks of YBa2Cu3O7-δ films deposited by metalorganic and pulsed laser deposition on biaxially textured Ni-W substrates

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 923-934

Publisher

MATERIALS RESEARCH SOCIETY
DOI: 10.1557/JMR.2006.0110

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report a detailed study of the grain orientations and grain boundary (GB) networks in YBa2CU3O7-delta (YBCO) films similar to 0.8 mu m thick grown by both the in situ pulsed laser deposition (PLD) process and the ex situ metalorganic deposition (MOD) process on rolling-assisted biaxially textured substrates (RABiTS). The PLD and MOD growth processes result in columnar and laminar YBCO grain structures, respectively. In the MOD-processed sample [full-width critical current density J(c)(0 T, 77 K) = 3.4 MA/cm(2)], electron back-scatter diffraction (EBSD) revealed an improvement in both the in-plane and out-of-plane alignment of the YBCO relative to the template that resulted in a significant reduction of the total grain boundary misorientation angles. A YBCO grain structure observed above individual template grains was strongly correlated to larger out-of-plane tilts of the template grains. YBCO GBs meandered extensively about their corresponding template GBs and through the thickness of the film. In contrast, the PLD-processed film [full width J(c)(0 T, 77 K) = 0.9 MA/cm(2)] exhibited nearly perfect epitaxy, replicating the template grain orientations. No GB meandering was observed in the PLD-processed film with EBSD. Direct transport measurement of the intra-grain J(c)(0 T, 77 K) values of PLD and MOD-processed films on RABiTS revealed values up to 4.5 and 5.1 MA/cm(2), respectively. As the intra-grain J(c) values were similar, the significantly higher full-width J(c) for the MOD-processed sample is believed to be due to the improved grain alignment and extensive GB meandering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available