4.6 Article

Phospholipase B activity enhances adhesion of Cryptococcus neoformans to a human lung epithelial cell line

Journal

MICROBES AND INFECTION
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 1006-1015

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.10.018

Keywords

Cryptococcus; adhesion; phospholipase; lung; epithelium; infrared; spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Secreted phospholipase B (PLB1), which contains three enzyme activities in the one protein, is necessary for the initiation of pulmonary infection by Cryptococcus neoformans and for dissemination from the lung via the lymphatics and blood. Adhesion to lung epithelium is the first step in this process, therefore we investigated the role of PLB1 in adhesion to a human lung epithelial cell line, A549, using C. neoformans var. grubii wild-type strain H99, a PLB1 deletion mutant (Delta plb1), and a reconstituted strain (Delta plb1(rec)). Adhesion of H99 and Delta plb1(rec) was approximately 69% greater than Delta plb1 at 4 h. Adhesion of Delta plb1 significantly increased after killing by chemicals or heat, and Fourier-transformed analysis by FTIR spectroscopy indicated this was due to changes in capsular and/or cell wall polysaccharides and proteins. Inhibition by specific PLB1 antibodies, or inhibitors of phospholipase B (PLB), but not lysophospholipase (LPL) or lysophospholipase transacylase (LPTA) activities decreased the adhesion of H99 and Delta plb1(rec) by 33-58%. Growth under conditions of osmotic stress and high glucose concentration increased both PLB secretion and subsequent cryptococcal adhesion. Dose-dependent increases (to 67%) in adhesion of live Delta plb1 were observed in the presence of 0.1-2 mM palmitic acid. We conclude that PLB I plays a role in the binding of C. neoformans to host lung epithelial cells, possibly due to production of fatty acids from plasma membranes and/or surfactant by PLB activity. (c) 2005 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available