4.3 Article

Effect of lamotrigine on sexual function in patients with epilepsy

Journal

SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 142-149

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2005.12.006

Keywords

epilepsy; lamotrigine; CSFQ; sexual function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess the course of sexual function in epilepsy patients treated with lamotrigine. Material and methods: This open study included 141 patients treated with lamotrigine for a period of 8 months: 79 patients initiated treatment with lamotrigine monotherapy, and 62 were switched to lamotrigine because of lack of efficacy or adverse events to a previous antiepileptic drug (AED). Patients were assessed at baseline and after 4 and 8 months of treatment. In the baseline and final visits the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ) was applied. Analysis was performed in an intent-to-treat population. Results: In women who started treatment with lamotrigine, a significant improvement was observed, both in total CSFQ score (increase of 5.39 +/- 6.95 points; p < 0.05), and in the five dimensions of the scale (desire/frequency, desire/interest, pleasure, arousal/excitement and orgasm). In men, a significant improvement was only observed in the pleasure dimension. In the group of patients in whom a previous AED was substituted by lamotrigine, significant improvement was recorded in the dimensions of pleasure and orgasm in men and desire/frequency in women, whilst in women the desire/interest dimension showed a decrease. Conclusions: In this observational study, an improvement in sexual dysfunction was observed in association with lamotrigine. This could have been the result of improvement of the epilepsy, changes in quality of life, elimination of side effects from other AEDs, or a mood-stabilizing effect of lamotrigine. (c) 2006 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available