4.7 Article

Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Using Pressurized Aerosol as an Alternative to Liquid Solution: First Evidence for Efficacy

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 553-559

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3213-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Robert Bosch Foundation (Stuttgart, Germany)
  2. Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF, Berlin, Germany) [0316186D]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is an unmet medical need. Despite recent improvements, systemic chemotherapy has limited efficacy. We report the first application of intraperitoneal chemotherapy as a pressurized aerosol in human patients. Methods. Three end-stage patients with advanced PC from gastric, appendiceal, and ovarian origin were treated as a compassionate therapy. All patients had received previous systemic chemotherapy. A pressurized aerosol of CO2 loaded with doxorubicin 1.5 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 7.5 mg/m(2) (pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy, PIPAC) was applied into the abdomen for 30 min at a pressure of 12 mmHg and a temperature of 37 degrees C. Results. No side-effects >2 CTCAE were observed, and the procedures were well tolerated. Early hospital discharge was possible (days 2-5). Nuclear presence of doxorubicin was documented throughout the peritoneum, reaching high local concentration (<= 4.1 mu mol/g) and plasma concentration was low (4.0-6.2 ng/ml). PIPAC created no significant adhesions, could be repeated, and was applied 6x, 4x, and 2x. Two patients showed a complete and one a partial histological remission. Mean survival after the first PIPAC was 288 days. One patient is alive after 567 days. Conclusions. PIPAC shows superior pharmacological properties with high local concentration and low systemic exposure. PIPAC can induce regression of PC in chemo-resistant tumors, using 10 % of a usual systemic dose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available