4.7 Article

Factors Affecting Prognosis of Patients with Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine: Retrospective Analysis of 102 Patients in a Single Center

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 804-810

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2707-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81102036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the mobile spine is a benign tumor, but it can be potentially aggressive. There is not much published information on GCT of the mobile spine as a result of rarity of the disease, and there are controversies over prognostic factors of the condition. A retrospective analysis of GCT of the mobile spine was performed by survival analysis. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as the interval between the date of surgery and the date of recurrence. The postoperative RFS rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors with P values of a parts per thousand currency sign0.1 were subjected to multivariate analysis for RFS by proportional hazard analysis. P values of a parts per thousand currency sign0.5 were considered statistically significant. A total of 102 patients with GCT of the mobile spine were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 39.9 (median 26.0, range 2-153) months. Thirty-eight patients developed recurrence. The univariate and multivariate analysis suggested that age less than 40 years, total spondylectomy either by en bloc or piecemeal method, and administration of bisphosphonate were independent favorable prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis by excluding patients before the year 2000 further confirmed our findings. The removal of the entire osseous compartment either by en bloc or piecemeal method in combination with the long-term use of bisphosphonate could significantly reduce the recurrence rate of GCT of the mobile spine. Age less than 40 years is a favorable prognostic factor for GCT in the mobile spine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available