4.7 Article

Sentinel Node Biopsy is Indicated for Thin Melanomas ≥0.76 mm

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages 3335-3342

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2469-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA076292] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A consensus for which patients with thin melanomas (a parts per thousand currency sign1 mm) should undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is not established. We describe a large single institution experience with SLNB for thin melanomas to determine factors predictive of nodal metastases. Retrospective review from 2005 to 2010 identified 271 patients with thin melanomas who underwent SLNB, along with 13 additional patients not treated with SLNB who developed a nodal recurrence as first site of recurrence. Clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with nodal status and outcome. Median age was 55 years, and 53 % of patients were male. Median Breslow thickness was 0.85 mm. Overall, a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) was found in 22 (8.1 %) of 271 cases; 8.4 % of melanomas a parts per thousand yen0.76 mm were SLN positive with 5 % of T1a melanomas a parts per thousand yen0.76 mm and 13 % of T1b melanomas a parts per thousand yen0.76 mm having SLN metastases. Only two of 33 highly selected patients with melanomas < 0.76 mm (both T1b) had a positive SLN. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that mitotic rate a parts per thousand yen1/mm(2) significantly correlated with nodal disease (p < 0.05) and ulceration correlated with SLN metastases (p < 0.05). Median follow-up was 2.1 years. Overall survival did not differ between positive and negative SLN patients (p = 0.53) but was worse for patients presenting with a nodal recurrence (p < 0.01). SLN metastases were seen in 8.4 % of thin melanomas a parts per thousand yen0.76 mm, including 5 % of T1a melanomas a parts per thousand yen0.76 mm. We believe these rates are sufficient to justify consideration of SLNB in these patients, while the indications for SLNB in melanomas < 0.76 mm remain to be defined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available